That's not to say that I feel especially critical about this book, or that I had a strongly negative reading experience, or that you shouldn't read it. But it does mean that I did not sink into this book. I did not luxuriate in it. It was not one of those books that reminded me of why I love to read.
I think I felt a little bit lost as I read. One issue was my own ignorance. I had absolutely no context for this book, having no awareness of the civil war that was fought in Sri Lanka from 1983 to 2009, and this was not the type of book to provide much context or to add much to my knowledge. There is pleasure in reading a book that is subtly written, where details are hinted at rather than spelled out, when there is guesswork and interpretation involved, but this is only truly pleasurable when the reader feels able to fit some puzzle pieces together. Instead, I felt as if I was reading a dark book in the darkness, and I merely stumbled my way through it.
I suppose I should try to give a brief summary of the book. Anil Tissera is a forensic anthropologist of Sri Lankan heritage. She is sent back to her home country by an international human rights group to investigate government-linked murders. It is not a plot-heavy book, but despite this, there are plenty of horrors described (highway crucifixion is one that sticks in my mind). And I spent most of the book assuming that Anil was doomed (why else would the book be called Anil's Ghost?) but she survived, which left me trying to determine the identity of Anil's ghost. Is it her coworker Sarath who ensures she is able to get out of the country safely? Is it Sailor, the skeleton on which she focuses much of her work? Is it Ananda's wife Sirissa? Is she haunted by Sri Lanka itself?

No comments:
Post a Comment